Thursday, October 12, 2017

THE PRESENT ELEPHANT POPULATION OF SRI LANKA

The elephant population is the net result of the additions by successful births and the deductions by death and capture. As with human population determinations, periodical surveys determine the elephant population but due to their forest habitats and daily movements over a vast area by each elephant, exact counts are impossible. However painstaking work by professionals in the field give reliable approximate counts.

For several years prior to 2015, public confidence on the Department of Wildlife Conservation (D-WLC) was rather eroded, misplaced and lacking due to suspected kidnaping efforts of calves from jungles, confirmed subsequently by the detection in 2015 of about sixty calves in illegal custody and the alleged disappearance for some time and alleged irregularities of the register of records of tame elephants maintained by the D-WLC. This scenario of the Department of Wildlife Conservation gave rise to a degree of sceptism of their activities for several years prior to 2015.

Therefore, the writer of this article starts with the 1993 surrey of wild elephants attempted by the D-WLC. This survey was unfortunately incomplete as no figures were obtained for the 'Northern' and ' Eastern' regions, due to the civil war which prevailed then but the elephant population for the rest of the island was estimated at 1967. However, in 1990, a survey of the elephant population of the entire island was done by Messrs. Santhiapillai and Jackson. (' The Asian Elephant - An action plan for its conservation' - IUSN / SSC, Asian elephant specialist group). Since both these surreys were done within 3 years of each other, it is reasonable to add the elephant population figures of the Northern and Eastern regions of the 1990 Santhiapillai and Jackson survey to the 1993 survey of the D- WLC and reconstruct an elephant population figure of the island for 1993. The figures of the Santhiapillai and Jackson survey corresponding to the D-WLC's Northern and Eastern regions are as follows,

image

Average of the Minimum and Maximum figures is 1025.

This gives a reconstructed island elephant population of 2992 for 1993, with the addition of 1025 to 1967.

An accepted composition of the elephant population by many is as follows.

Clarke (1901)

Adult Bulls 20%

Breeding Cows 30%

Juveniles and Calves 50%

The breeding cycle of a she elephant is taken as 4 to 5 years and could be taken as 4.5 years for computations. (Gestation period is 24 months.)

Kurt (1969) says in ' Observations on Ceylon Elephants' in Loris Vol. XII, No 5, that only 60% of the calves born reach adulthood.

Based on the above assumptions, the annual increase of the elephant population of 2992 is 120, computed as follows,

image

The number of elephants killed during a period of 12 years from 1998 to 2010 in Sri Lanka is recorded as 1369, which gives an average loss annually for this period as 141. The highest killed per year during this period was 179 in 2007. The D- WLC's average of elephants killed due to the elephant - human conflict in rated as 120 per annum.

In comparing the addition of 120 elephants annually to the elephant population and a deduction of 120 elephants annually, the present elephant population is still 2992 or in other words, it could be said that the present elephant population in the wilds of Sri Lanka is not more than 3000.

Yasantha De Silva.

BSc. (Agriculture)

Email: ydesilva2013@gmail.com

Saturday, September 16, 2017

ELEPHANTS AND RELIGIOUS BELIEFS

ELEPHANTS AND RELIGIOUS BELIEFS

01. Hindu Religion.

The elephant is the most conspicuous of the few animals which is endowed with a godly status in any religion in the world. The elevation of the elephant to such a position in the Hindu religion is a matter of great speculation. In Hindu beliefs, God Ganepathy is a member of the Hindu pantheon of gods. He is regarded as the younger son of God Siva and goddess Parvathi, their elder son being God Skanda (God Kataragama in Sri Lanka). God Siva is one of the triad of the supreme gods, the others being Brahma, the creator and God Vishnu.

Every Hindu temple in the world has a statue of God Ganepathy, which is characterized by the head, face, ears and trunk of an elephant and the body, hands and legs of a human.

Hindus regard God Ganepathy to be the god for intelligence, memory, wisdom, patience, strength and endurance and all devotees first worship God Ganepathy on entering the temples, Shrines dedicated to god Ganepathy are found by the roadways and forest paths over the vast extents of rural areas of India and Sri Lanka and people seek his divine protection from all calamities. Hindus in Sri Lanka also use the name ' Pillaiyar' for God Ganepathy. Rev. Baldaeus, the Dutch predicant of 1657, in his ' Description of Ceylon ' (1672), states of the Tamil community of the districts of Mannar and Jaffna, 'that they pay much attention to the head of an elephant, made of either wood or stone, to acquire wisdom' and that 'they adorn their idols with flowers.'

It is believed that prehistoric migrations from some regions in Northern Europe, Western Russia etc.. to the Indian peninsula through its North Western mountain passes resulted in the establishment of an Indo - European community of people settling first in the plains of the Indus river and gradually spreading over to the other parts of India. These Indo - Europeans were a pastoral people tending cattle and cultivating land and were strict vegetarians. With time, the religion which we call Hinduism evolved in their society, which placed special emphasis on spiritual development of its followers. They also excelled in their knowledge of metaphysics and mathematics. This ' Hindu Culture' existed in India before the advent of both Buddhism and Jainism. As the northern limits of the elephants habitat even now, encompasses the foot hills of the Himalayas, these people would have observed the elephants which dwelled in the valleys, plaings and forests of India. Did the seers, sages, rishis and mystics amongst these people elevate the elephants to a god for the followers of their religion, to emulate its outstanding and noble qualities which they observed, for the benefit of human society and also protect the elephant for the role it plays for the healthy sustenance of the world by its important role in the conservation of forests? Careful observers of elephants realise that elephants possess all the noble qualities which human beings are always in short supply of while they are not in possession of the base qualities that human beings are never short of. In the Hindu religion, this message is stressed to mankind, by having the human form only beneath the head of an elephant in the statues of God Ganepathy or in other words replacing the human head with that of an elephant.

Sir, Emerson Tenant, the British Colonial secretary, resident in Sri Lanka, from1845 to 1850, in his unique literary monument 'Ceylon' (1859), states, in the long chapter on ' Elephants' in volume II, that the elephant is a harmless and peaceful animal. In order to dispel doubts that the elephant is a dangerous animal, he has given statistics of human casualties caused by various animals as follows, for the period 1849 to 1855 : elephants 16, Buffaloes 15, crocodiles 6, boars 2, bear 1, serpents 68 Reading through the accounts given by British hunters of these times, even of these 16 deaths by elephants, several were Britishers, engaged in 'elephants shoots', who had dared to get too close to elephants and paid the price for their misfirings and misadventures.

What are the outstanding qualities of elephants which elevated them to a godly status in the Hindu religion? Both in the African and Asian species, they all display the following characteristics and possibly these were also some which qualified them to a godly status in prehistoric India.

· They never fight with each other for territory, food or water.

· In comparison to human beings who are divided from each other on basis of race, colour, tribes, castes, religion, politics etc.. elephants do not amongst themselves have any divisions and mix and act feely.

· Their altruism is of the highest order, especially in looking after their young, exemplified by,

§ All calves are nursed by all the lactating elephants in the herd, irrespective of whether a calf is one's own or not.

§ When in danger the calves are thrust into the center of the herd and surrounded by a sea of legs to give them maximum protection.

§ Calves are kept upstream of adults elephants when herds negotiate rivers, to prevent calves getting carried downstream with the current.

§ The male elephants on reaching sexual maturity, vacate the herd, spread out and forage elsewhere which gives a better chance for she elephants and calves to sustain themselves better on the limited supplies of food and water needed for their existence than with all adult males also in the herd.

· Always there is discipline and order in the herd and the leader's authority is never challenged.

· For the duties of guarding or reconnoitering or attacking etc, it is only one individual of the herd who engages itself in performing the necessary task at anyone instant and there is no interference by any other of the herd.

This exemplary conduct of all the elephants in their elephantine society is far above the conduct of humans, inspite of all the human efforts to improve themselves anywhere on this earth and each elephant is a super and just ' Dharma being' not encountered elsewhere in the entire terrestrial world, inclusive of human beings.

02. Elephants in Buddhism.

Two incidents concerning elephants are mentioned in Buddhist lore. First, Queen Mahamaya Devi the mother of prince Siddhartha, who later became Lord Buddha, is said to have seen in a dream, a white elephant with a white lotus flower grasped in its trunk, encircling her thrice and then entering her body, which coincided with the time that prince Siddhartha was conceived by her.

The second involves the tusker, Nallagiri. Devadattha, a prince of royal blood and a cousin of Lord Buddha, was jealous of the widespread glory Lord Buddha enjoyed in society. He plied Nalagiri with liquor to intoxication, goaded him to extreme fury and drove him towards Lord Buddha, hoping it to kill Lord Buddha. But, Nalagiri even though in a drunken rage, discerned the immense kindness of the Buddha, knelt down in front and saluted the Buddha.

03. God Saman, his elephant and ' Gana Devi'

In ancient times, many kings, such as Vijayabahu I (1055 to 1114 AD) and Nissankamalla (1187 to 1196 AD) have visited Adam's Peak, which in believed to be one of the three sites visited by Lord Buddha before the recorded period of the introduction of Buddhism to Sri Lanka, corresponding to the reign of king Devanampiyatissa between 307 and 247 BC. God Saman is regarded to the custodian deity of Adam's Peak. Tennent (1859) states Major skinner mentioning that he had seen the spoor of elephants on top of Adam's Peak, probably meaning close to the summit and not the summit itself. Therefore, in times earlier than recorded history of the Mahawansa, just as how God Ganepathy was a subject of Hindu beliefs in India, God Saman and the elephant would have been a belief of the pre- Vijayan inhabitants of Sri Lanka. At present in the Sinhala settlements in forested areas, villagers seek the protection of 'Gane Devi', which are in shrines with stone sculptures of God Ganepathy, beneath huge trees by the wayside.

04. Wild elephants at Somawathy - Chaitya National park in Sri Lanka.

The Somawathy dagaba lies within this National Park. It had been constructed in 161-137 BC by princess Somawathy, paternal aunt of King Dutugemunu and enshrines a sacred tooth relic of Lord Buddha. In his book, ' The radiant rays of the Buddha of the Somawathy Chaithya' Venerable Pahamune Sri Sumangala Nayaka thero, the chief priest of this temple, mentions of many instances when rays were emitted from the chaitya and wild elephants paid homage to the chaithya. On 4th July 1981, on the occasion of the pinnacle laying ceremony of the dagaba, the then president of Sri Lanka, Hon. Mr. J.R. Jayawardene, his retinue and the chief priest had observed the emission of six hued rays for 45 minutes. The chief priest also describes three instances of wild elephants visiting the chaitya at night, bend themselves at their knees and raise their trunks to salute the Chaitya. The Somawathy chaitya together with the surrounding forests in the most extraordinary place in the entire world where the extrasensory perception of wild elephants interact with the unchartered mysteries around the sacred relicts of Lord Buddha. The late Sri Lankan president, Hon. J.R. Jayawardene, has made the greatest contribution to Buddhism and the wild elephants of Sri Lanka since Independance in 1948 by declaring the environs of the Somawathy Chaitya as National Parks (Somawathy NP 37762 ha in 1986 and the Flood Plain NP 17350 ha in 1984)

I have had the good fortune to have heard chief priest Venerable Randiligama Ananda Thero of the Sri Buwenekaba Maha Viharaya, mention that on a visit to the Somawathy Chaithya in 2001, in the company of two other chief priests, Venerable Talawathura Pagnatissa Nayake Thero and Venerable Niyamgamdora Wimalajothi Nayaka Thero, that while they were resting inside the van, at 1.30am, all of them saw two wild elephants enter the premises of the chaithya and walk around it, with one of them touching with its outstretched trunk, the alters, bedecked with blossoms placed by devotees during the daylight hours and immediately raise its trunk to the chaitya in salutation.

Since the mid 13th century, the Somawathy Chaithya and its environs was covered over by jungle. When it was discovered in 1947, the Chaitya precincts were home to a large herd of elephants. Its certain that, during the seven centuaries from the 13th, it is only the presence of elephants which prevented the destruction of the Chaithya by vandals and treasure hunters. At present, even during daylight hours, with pilgrims around the Chaitya, wild elephants from the surrounding forests, visits the chaitya, remain calmly for sometime on their side of the electric fence and return back to the forests.

05. The privileged position of the elephants preceding the advent of the Portuguese in 1505 AD to Sri Lanka.

Although the Hindus have granted a godhy status to the elephant, the Sri Lankan Buddhists have not placed the elephant on the altar of worship. However, the elephants in the Island, under the rule of kings enjoyed royal protection which is stated in the books by Captain Robert Knox (1681) and Rev. Phillipus Baldaeus. (1972).

Captain Robert Knox, who was a prisoner of king Rajasinghe II, in the Kandyan Kingdom from 1660 to 1680 has stated in the book ' Historical Relation of Ceylon' that the capture of elephants must be preceded by permission granted by the king and no one is permitted to lift a hand against elephants in spite of damages to crops by elephants.

Rev. Phillipus Baldaens, Dutch predikant, who came to Ceylon on the conquest of Colombo by the Dutch in 1656, spent nine years in the Island with one year at Matara and the balance in Northern Ceylon with the Tamil Community and after leaving the Island in 1665, published the book 'Description of Ceylon' in 1672. He had access to important historical documents and writes of one of the conditions of the contract entered into on 23rd May 1638 between the Dutch officer Admiral Adam Westerwold and King Rajasinghe II, " With respect to the sale of elephants, which are the sole property of His Majesty...."

Though both refer to times after the advent of the Portuguese, the royal protection to elephants stem from the times of the ancient kings.

As mentioned earlier, the elephant has had the special status as the companion of God Saman, the custodian deity, of Adams' Peak, which is a belief that would have been held also by ancient kings, some of whom have visited Sri Pada.

The rock temples of Gadaladeniya and Lankathilake in Sri Lanka, built in the 14th Century, for the worship of Lord Buddha and various gods, are also profusely decorated with store sculptures of the heads of elephants.

Further, Archaeologist Mr. H.C.P. Bell discovered in the lower reaches of the Mahaweli, far below Manampitiya, a life sized sculpture of an elephant belonging to the Polonnaruwa period or an earlier era.

The absolute and indispensable necessity of the elephants as the beavers and protectors, of the sacred Tooth Relic of Lord Buddha, as a warrior, as the Beast of Burden for the construction of the granite sluices, anicuts and dams, the foundations of stupendous dagabas, temples, palaces, ponds and the massive earthen embankments of gigantic reservoir's and channels which all needed and used its prodigious power, energy, skill and its ability to think and perform as an engineer, surveyor, mason and fitter, to lift and place, to bear and endure, to push and pull, to haul and carry, to trample and compact vast loads must have given the elephants a status equivalent or even above, that accorded to the highest of men in the land in ancient society.

06. The first Sri Lankan Ambassador to the Vatican.

The first Sri Lankan Ambassador to the Vatican is of special interest because of reflecting, it connects back to what impressions elephants created in the minds of the Indo - Europeans, whose forebears crossed the high mountain passes of North Western India to settle down in that country. This anecdote in from the book ' Ceylon of the early travellers' by a former Ambassdor of Sri Lanka to Italy, Mr. H.A.J. Hulugalle. In it is stated, that in 1507, a small elephant taken from Ceylon to India, was despatched by the Portugese Viceroy to king Manuel of Portugul Annone, as it was called, spent seven years in Lisbon, when King Manuel Presented Annone to to His Excellancy, The pope Leo X. At the Vatican, Annone captuted the hearts of the Cardinals and the artists in addition to that of the Pope, but unfortunately, it had died three years later due to digestive disorders arising from the large variety of foods given to it by well-wishers. Apart from the singular event of its burial in the Vatican gardens, its memory is fondly retained in the sculpture of a fountain designed by Cardinal Giuliano Medici, who himself became Pope Clement VII. Though the fountain was later destroyed during the sack of Rome, the head and the curly trunk of the model Annone still exists in ' Villa Madama' the present official residence of the Italian Prime Minister. In addition, the elephant in the mural of the loggia of the palace, done by the Umbrian painter Raphael, a contemporary of Annone at the Vatican premises, would without a doubt, be a portrait from the life of Annone. Out of the thousands of elephants exported from Ceylon, during the Colonial rule of the Portugese, the Dutch and the British, lasting period of 443 years, perhaps, it was only Annone, who at least had the fortune to spend a restful life of love and peace and be remembered forever with gratitude, in the sacred precints of the Vatican.

07. The Elephant versus the Lion an the emblem of the National Flag.

It is sad to note that Sri Lanka, which has from the time to the reign of King Devanampiyatissa (307-247BC), endeavored to retain Buddhism as the national religion, still has as its national emblem the carnivorous lion, a complete foreigner, both physically and culturally, but, so far the Sri Lankans have never been able to grant this position to the elephant, the immemorial, inhabitant who displays many noble and valuable qualities in degrees far surpassing human beings in the island and which cause it to deserve itself to be placed as the national emblem instead of the lion.

08. Abuse of the elephant in logos.

Within the last 150 years, the elephant has been used as an emblem for various organizations and institutions in Sri Lanka, but it seems that it has been done without a true appreciation of the qualities of the elephants but only to advertise and emphasize the power of the organizations. This has only resulted in making the elephant unpopular among people, especially its use as a political emblem causing also a loss of hopes of survival for the elephants.

09. The Decimation, the Desecration and the Forsaking of the elephants in Sri Lanka.

The Sri Lankan Buddhists have never deified the elephant, although they worship God Saman accompanied by an elephant. The sacred Tooth Relic is also borne on a tusker and elephant sculptures adorn some temples such as Gadaladeniya and Lankathilaka. In comparison, the Tamil Hindu Community predominant in the districts of Jaffna, Mannar, Kilinochchi, Mulllativu, Trincomalee and Batticoloa and considerable in the districts of Vavunia and Ampara worship God Ganepathy (Pillaiyar). However both the Sinhala Buddhist and Tamil Hindu Communities have been apathetic and indifferent to the sad plight of the elephants since the advent of the Portugese in 1505 AD.

The Portugese (from 1505 to 1658 AD) increased by leaps and bounds the capture of elephants by the use of kraals they introduced from India for the capture from the maritime districts they controlled and maintained an average export figure of 37 elephants annually (Abeysinghe 1966). The Dutch (From 1658 to 1796AD) , further increased the captures and exports to 100-150 annually (Tennent1859) to the " Mooren" traders who came from Bengal and the Coromandel coast (Baldeus 1672). They housed the captured elephants in the Jaffna Peninsula which had over 1500 stalls to hold them for auctions and exports and exported them from Karaitivu (Jurriansse 1940). Exports from Mannar also prevailed during the Dutch period.

The British (1796 to 1948) resorted to the wholesale slaughter of elephants, even allowing (or is it encouraging!) the " Caffres" of the Pioneer Crop of the Kandyan Province to butcher and 'eat the heart of elephants' to butcher and eat the hearts (Tennent 1859), the killing of elephants as a " Sport " , the offering of rewards to villagers throught the island for the killing of elephants (Tennent 1859 : 3500 elephants killed between 1845 and 1848 in the Northern Province, 2000 elephants killed between 1851 and 1856 in the Southern Province), initially the Reward payment was 10 to 15 shillings per elephant killed, while the Jaffna coconut planting community paid 10 pounds per elephant killed and the British continued the Kraal captures which exceeded 50 kraals for the British period of the 19th Centuary ( Modder 1898). Further, pannikans (moorish elephant catchers ) capturing elephants for sale to Arabs from India are stated to shoot mothers to enable them to capture their young (Adams, Assistant Government Agent Batticoloa 1869). Clark, the Commissioner of Forests for 25 years, up to 1900, states that the pannikans caught 2190 elephants for export from 1863 to 1899 but their methods were so destructive that two deaths occured for each elephant which survived, which accounts for 4440 deaths of elephants by pannikans from 1863 to 1899 alone!

It could be assumed that by 1900, not only the wetzone of Sri Lanka but, the Jaffna District had also lost its elephant population. The colonisation schemes, the Galoya, Walawe and Mahaweli Projects all brought in their wake large numbers of elephant killings by farmers by shooting and by other devious, cruel means designed by farmers to escape detection. In most cases, the elephant drives and translocations done by the wild life department and various authorities, to reduce elephant - human conflicts had alarming casualty rates but were not publicized to avoid the hue and cry of the elephant conservation minded factions of the public. However, it could be said that the entire Sri Lankan population remain apathetic, deaf, dumb and blind to the agony of the suffering the elephants were and are subjected to.

In a nutshell, the coming of the Portugese to the island started a train of events which is recorded in detail in history, administrative reports, literary accounts, drawings, etchings on wood, photographs etc.. that all three colonial powers, the Portuguese, the Dutch and the British as well as all three major communities living in this island, the Sinhalese, Tamils and Muslims, played an active part in both the physical decimation of the elephants and the desecration of the lofty position the elephant occupied in religion and culture in the Tamil Hindu and Sinhala Buddhist communities in the Island, leading to the destruction of the core values of co-existence between men and elephants which was a feature of our Island's ancient civilization.

10. The Conservation of elephants, Inter racial harmony and the renaissance of the dry zone economy .

Sri Lanka is now having its last chance to ensure the survival of its elephants and it needs the co-operation of the three major communities, the Sinhalese, the Tamils and the Muslims in the various regions of the dry zone in which they predominate, to implement a conservation programme to ensure both the survival of the elephant into the future and an economic renaissance plan based on tourism using more national parks created for elephants to benefit the people of the various areas of the dry zone.

Though it has not been mentioned before, the elephant is a 'common denominator;' connecting the Tamil Hindu community with their belief in God Ganepathy and the Sinhala Buddhist community in their worship of God Sumana Saman who is accompanied by an elephant. Peace, instead of discord, between the two communities would prevail, as between all elephants who have no barriers amongst themselves, if both strive to protect and conserve the elephants of Sri Lanka, as elephants occupy a special place in the religion of one and its participation in the ancient civilization and the present religious culture of the other.


References :- The Dry Zone of Sri Lanka

The Mahaweli Development Scheme and Elephants (Parts I and II)

https:// lkelephants.blogspot.com

http:// mahawelifailure.blogspot.com

Yasantha De Silva.

B.Sc (Agriculture)

Wednesday, August 16, 2017

The dry zone of Sri Lanka, The Mahaweli Development Scheme (MDS) and elephants. (Part II)



            The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (I.B.R.D) is the originator of the M.D.S. The Introduction of the Mahaweli General Report of 1968 mentions that the I.B.R.D. mission which visited Sri Lanka (Ceylon) in May 1961, pointed out that the MDS is a promising multipurpose schema to meet Ceylon's economic needs". It meant that the MDS would be the answer to all the economic ills which plagued Ceylon in 1961. Subsequently the UNDP/SF, the government of Ceylon and the FAO, followed the dictates of the IBRD and in 1968, the FAO presented to the Government of Ceylon the Mahaweli General Report for the utilization of the Mahaweli Resources for the Irrigation of the dry zone and hydropower development of the island.
            The implementation of the MDS commenced in 1969 and as the MDS in 49 years old now, it is opportune to review whether the MDS has fulfilled the aspiration that the IBRD made in May 1961.
            The utilization of the Mahaweli waters for dry zone agriculture commenced during the reign of King Vasabha in 67-III AD and continued upto the reign of King Parakkrama Bahu, The Great (1153 to 1186 AD) . King  Vasabha  constrcted the Elahera anicut and a zomile long channel to conduct water to the Minneriya tank and King Parakkrama Bahu, improved the Angamedilla anicut and  'Akaga Ganga' channel to deliver more water to the Parakkrama Samuddra. During the intervening period of about 1119 years between the reigns of these two kings, several kings constructed more ancients, dams and channels to utilize the Mahaweli waters for the development of the ancient Rajarata and the Maduru Oya Basin of the dry zone. (Ref : My-'Ancient Irrigation Schemes based on the Mahaweli Ganga' mahawelifailure.blogsport.com)
            After a  lapse of about seven and a half centauries, an effort was made by the late Mr. D.S. Senanayake, in 1931, to revive dry zone agriculture and used the Mahaweli waters again by utilizing the anicient anicuts at Elahera and Angamedilla on the Amban Ganga and the Minipe anicut on the Mahaweli ganga.
            Without a doubt, the ways in which the Mahaweli Ganga was used in the Ancient Irrigation System of the Rajarata has been copied by the MDS but the question now arises whether the MDS would be equally effective.
            During the past several years, there has been recurrent water shortages in the major tanks and these prevented the full issues of water needed for paddy cultivation which affected paddy production in the Mahaweli systems B, C, G and H. Such water shortages are too frequent to be dismissed casually, saying that they are due to droughts or dry weather in the Mahaweli catchment areas. The MDS itself was designed to overcome water shortages for cultivations in the dry zone. In 2016, the paddy production in the paddy production in the Mahaweli area fell below expectations and the drought throught the country was blamed. By the end of 2016, the drought ended with copious rain which tilled the dried up dry zone reservoirs again to spill level and many people declared that paddy  cultivation would be successful in 2017. But, again this year,  There are difficulties to provide sufficient water from the major tanks for paddy cultivation, so much so, that the government is once again forced, as it was in 2016, to immediate import rice for 2017.
            What happened to all that water in the tanks which reached spill levels in 2016. Is the demand for water exceeding the capacity of supply from the tanks and their argumentation sources? Are the augmentation sources failing? Are there unaccounted, undisclosed discussed and undetected factors operating, causing losses of water from major tanks?
            Such frequent paddy production shortages in the Mahaweli are contrary to the IBRD statement that the MDS in a promising multipurpose scheme for Ceylon's economic needs.
            Besides the, government has also to pay compensation to farmers who had to forego cultivation or suffered crop losses due to the lack of water issues. When the MDS was implemented in 1969and continued as the AMDP in 1977, it was believed that the Mahaweli farmers will feed the Nation, but it now looks the that during the 48 years of existence, the MDS has evolved into a position that the nation will here to keep feeling the Mahaweli farmers.
            To understand how the MDS in gradually descending from the Aladin's Magic Lamp in 1968 to almost on mirage by now (2017) it is necessary to compare the water supply from the Mahaweli Ganga in the Ancient Irrigation System (AIS) with the MDS.
a)      In the AIS, the Mahaweli catchment in the wet zone was primeval forest and the pattern of water flow to the Mahaweli river was proportionately less by runoff during the rains and more by springs releasing the rain water which had infiltrated into the soil depths of the forest floor. This would have kept the water levels of the Mahaweli more constant through the year in ancient times, inspite of the monthly and yearly variations of the quantity of rainfall in the upper catchments of the Mahaweli Ganga. In the MDS, the former primeval forests are replaced completely with Tea and the Mahaweli is fed less by springs and more by the runoff, resulting in high water levels in the Mahaweli during rains and very low water levels in the dry seasons.
b)      Mahaweli water quality in the ANS was devoid of organic and inorganic chemicals (low eutrophy), which kept the channels, tanks and fields devoid of floating water plants. In the MDS, the Mahaweli water has a high level of organic and inorganic chemicals (hyper-eutrophy), resulting in the channels, tanks and fields becoming covered  with floating water plants like salvinia and Eichornia grandis (Japan Jabera), which increase water loss from tanks through transpiration, especially during dry weather with low relative humidities in the dry zone atmosphere which result in the lowering of water levels. (Ref: my - 'After effects of the MDS - Hyper Eutrophy'. Mahaweli failure.blogspot.com)
c)      In the AIS, the Mahaweli water was only for irrigation but in the MDS, the Mahaweli water has to be at any time, be divided between the requirements of irrigation and hydropower of the projects at Kotmale, Victoria, Randenigala, Moragahakanda and Rantambe. When priority is given for irrigation as it happened in 2015, hydropower  suffers and if hydropower outputs are to be maintained, irrigation has to be regulated and when Mahaweli water 'Yields' are low, both Suffer.
d)      In the AIS, evaporation and seepage losses of water was confirmed to the irrigation tanks and channels only. But in the MDS, the additional reservoirs used to stock water for hydropower also cause additional evaporation losses which increase with higher atmospheric temperatures and increase of wind speeds which occur from June to mid September in the dry zone. Thus, the transpiration, evaporation and seepage losses of the same quantity of water from the Mahaweli (which constant for the Alsand MDS) is greater in the MDS than in the AIS and therefore if unrestricted irrigation from the Mahaweli is contemplated for the dry zone, there is a strong likely hood that the increased seepage and evaporational losses in the MDS reservoir systems would affect these operations.
            Perhaps, it is now time to call a halt to all further developments of the MDS, which was designed to be completed in 30 years, but even after 48 years, it is still being pushed through, without a review of its past, which indicates the gradually increasing decay enveloping it. The MDS is the greatest threat to the survival of our grandest faunal asset, THE ELEPHANT, and over the past few years, the elephant has developed to be the greatest, priceless and indispensable economic asset of the dry zone and Sri Lanka and it is our duty that no longer should it be treated as an agricultural part as the Britishers did in the 19th century and attempted the genocide of the elephants in the island, Unlike in the past year (2016), present day state telecasts tend to emphasize that the elephant is a pest by featuring damages to crops and houses in the dry zone, and hide the stark realities of the casualties and the harassments to elephants by farmers and encroachers in the dry zone and creates the impression equivalent to the 19th century  British colonial view, that the  elephants should be got rid of.
Therefore at this stage, instead of stretching the 'Mahaweli Programme' the an elastic to cover every single square inch of land in the dry zone, it is far better to leave the balance of the dry zone under forest and grass as elephant  habitats, for the elephants are our best economic resource to draw thousands and thousands of tourists, year in and year out, from all over the world, bringing with them forgive exchange in dollars and pounds, euros and roubles, rupees and yen for the prosperity of the dry zone and Sri Lanka, which paddy production in the dry zone under the MDS can never expect to achieve.
Yasantha De Silva.
B.Sc. Agriculture

The Dry Zone of Sri Lanka, the Mahaweli Development Scheme and the Elephants. (Part One)



The Dry Zone of Sri Lanka, the Mahaweli Development Scheme and the Elephants. (Part One)
            The MDS lacked any sort of environment study. The project committees responsible for the Mahaweli Master Plan have been disgustingly insensitive to the loss of our tropical forests and our grandest faunal asset, the elephant. The project Report has very craftily and cunningly avoided stating that the envisaged areas of settlement and cultivation are existing elephant habitats and had also purposely refrained from having any environmentalists, local or foreign, in the Mahaweli Project Committees. The disastrous result of this lapse, is the prevailing ' Elephant - Human - conflicts' in and around systems B,C,G and H and the large number of elephants killed from the inception of the MDS in 1969 up to now.
            The Mahaweli Ganga Irrgation and hydropower Project Report of 1968 for the development for the water resources, of the Mahaweli Ganga, prepared by the FAO, does not mention anywhere  in the Project report that the lands to be developed  under the Mahaweli scheme and released for cultivations and settlements are also inhabited by elephants and therefore due to this, the plans outlined lacked any provision to provide alternate areas where the elephants displaced by the Mahaweli clearings could be accommodated.
            Additionally, the project plan has totally ignored elephant and wildlife habitats declared by statute. For example, under phase, project 2, which is the Victoria - Minipe Extension, the proposal of the extension of the Minipe Yoda ela to the Amban Ganga is through the Wasgomuwa Strict Nature Reserve. (Subsequently in 1984, it was declared  an a National Park.) The Project Repot  has failed to take cognizance of this, although it is stated in the Project Report, that field work was carried out from March 1965 to May 1968.
            Further, there is no care and consideration exercised at all in the design and construction of massive, cement lined channels, which pass through elephant habitats to enable any elephants which fall accidentally in to these channels to get out. Over the years, several elephants, which had fallen and swept down by the swift current had drowned in the cement lined Right Bank Channel from the Mahaweli Ganga at Minipe to Ulhitiya Oya (Vianna Ela).
            Under the Project Area Description of the Project report, only details of Relief, Climate, Soils, Geology, Hydrogeology and the names of a few cultivated crops are mentioned but conspicuous in its absences in this description is the obvious and well known fact that these lands are also the traditional habitats of elephants.
            Reading through the Mahaweli Project report, one cannot help recalling about the clearing of forests and prairies of the U.S.A. in the 18th and 19th centuries, in order to establish cultivations and animal husbandry of the immigrant European populations, which finally resulted both in the destruction of vast extents of forest and several lakhs of Blson, which almost became extinct through extermination by shooting until the National Bison society was established in the U.S.A. to save it. Closer home, at Borneo, where forests are cleared, the elephants killed  and palm oil plantations are established. In the 19th century, the British colonial Administration in Sri Lanka, also attempted to eradicate elephants by massive killing sprees maintained across the island.
            Up to the end of 1989, the clearings under the MDS, inclusive of the A.M.D.P, included four systems B,C,G and H and the areas developed for each system was follows,
            System                        Extent (ha)                                          (acves)
            B                                   24615                                                     60825
            C                                   41132                                                   101637
            G                                     6000                                                    14826
            H                                  24100                                                    59551
            Total                            95847                                                  2368839
             All these areas carried varying densities of elephant populations at the time the MDS clearings commenced. They also encompassed some of the colonization schemes established since 1933, which also had on- going elephant - human conflicts.
            Even when the MDS commenced in 1969, the rights of elephants were completely ignored and the illegal killing of elephants by people living in 'elephant - human conflict' areas was not taken seriously by any government.
            After the clearings of forest for the MDS and new settlements and cultivations were started, many of the displaced elephants kept coming back to their original habitats over and over again. The farmers and encroacher killed trespassing elephants as it was the surest way available to them though illegal, making sure that they don't get caught red handed and using cruel and devious ways, most of the time, for these killings. Even though elephant drives and translocations were done to contain and solve the ' elephant - human conflicts' , by the wildlife Department and the Accelerated Mahaweli Development Programme (AMDP) authorities, periodically elephants appeared on cleared areas as these areas also included their traditional migratory routes.
            However after sometime the establishment of permanent National parks etc for displaced elephants received serious consideration and ultimately, the AMDP from 1983 onwards declared four new National parks, and one new sanctuary and also upgraded the Wasgamuwa S.N.R. to a NP in 1984.
1983
Maduru oya National Park
ha
58550
1984
Flood Main National Park
ha
17350
1986
Somawathi Chaitya National Park
ha
37762
1987
Victoria - Randenigala - Rantambe National Park
ha
42088
1989
Kahalla - Pallekele Sanctuary   
ha
21290
Total

177040
            The enactment of these long overdue solutions by the AMDP management at the time, has at least, enabled the elephants to survive a few more years and push back the date of their extinction, as they had the security of these parks and the single sanctuary for their existence and to a certain extent safeguard their lives from the unrestrained killings by the Mahaweli farmers and land grabbing encroachers.
            The declaration of new national parks and a sanctuary proved conchasirely the faulty planning of the Mahaweli Project by the FAO in that the reality of the project area being the habitat of elephants, had not been given due consideration, as one of the biggest problems encountered by the new settler farmers and administrators was the intrusion of elephants into settlements and cultivations and by the conservationists, of the vanishing elephant habitats and elephant causalities. Since the election of Mr. Maithripala Sirisena as President in 2015, a large number of new development schemes under Mahaweli Development are happening, all over the ancient Rajarata, such as the Yanoya project, Malvatu oya Project, Maduru oya right bank project, Moragahakanda Project, Kaluganga Project and Wemedilla Project, each of which carry substantial elephant populations. This causes, once again, the elephants problems to come to the attention of elephant conservationists and the people of Sri Lanka because there are no arrangements visible to provide alternate habitats for the elephants getting displaced due  to these schemes. In the interests of the displaced elephants, who need safe habitats  for their survival and the continued survival of the elephant population in Sri Lanka, it is imperative to separate sufficient areas for their survival by declaring new National parks and sanctuaries with corridors to link them  to each other and to other already demarcated national parks and prevent settlements and cultivations in these areas, so that elephants could move about without intruding into settlements and cultivations and avoid more ' elephant- human' conflicts.
            The elephants in the island now, are just about the last two or three thousands of those who are descended from those which managed to escape the captures during the Portuguese (1505 to 1656 AD), Dutch (1656 to 1769 AD) and British (1796 to 1948 AD) colonial periods, the killing sprees for the eradication of elephants by  the British administration in the Island in the 19th century and the killings by farmers in the dry zone from 1948 up to now. Therefore, even the  solitary killings which occur frequently at various locations and the undetected deaths caused by festered and infected   injuries inflicted by inhuman criminal activities by humans, are pushing the elephants towards extinction as the point at which the annual birth rate in exceeded by the annual death rate is fast approaching or has been approached already. The time has now been reached that we cannot expect this tiny population of elephants in the while island to survive in to the future unless effective steps are taken immediately to safeguard and conserve every one of them. \
            Even though late, it is necessary to do an immediate study on the future of the elephants, who are now concentrated in the dry zone MDS project areas, because the Mahaweli Project Report of 1968 had totally ignored all issues concerning the widely distributed population of elephants within the ' Project Area". It is imperative to do this before proceeding further with more and move ' Mahaweli Developement Programmes which is now stretching like elastic and accelerating faster than even the Accelerated Mahaweli Development Programme of 1978 with timber extractions, forest clearings, encroachments, reservoir and channel constructions stretching in every direction of the ancient Rajarata and parts of Mayarata  to the whims and fancies of the dominant political faction of the North Central Province, working hectically and making hay while the sun shines.
            From the beginnings of the colonization schemes up to now, the whole business of giving land, cleared of forest, leveled, surveyed, promises made of water supplies, infrastructure and so forth, done at state expense, had the ulterior motive of the receipt of votes to the politicians who delivered the land. This exchange and understanding still persists and this is why politicians love the Mahaweli, for it is their Aladin's lamp.
            The political strife in the Island has been so vicious since 1948, (the year of Independence from British Colonial Rule), that anything and everything is sacrificed for the sake of gaining votes. Politicians think that even the votes of encroachers, who occupy state land reserved as dwellings or migratory routes of elephants, are also important to tip the scales in their favour and therefore no politician is prepared of lose these votes by taking the side of  elephants. Today, whenever elephants are subjected to casualties and harasments it is observed that politicians are deaf, blind and dumb to these incidents. Therefore, today, the fate of elephants is almost sealed by  the attitude and silence of politicians and it is clear that the conservation of elephants is a major political problem, as no politician is prepared to act on behalf of the elephants, although they are the people who possess the power and influence to do so.
            In Sri Lanka, Buddhism is the religion of the state, which means that the state should have concern, compassion and kindness to animals. If the state does not have this concern, compassion and kindness to wild elephants, how can it be said that Buddhism is the religion of the state? At present, in Sri Lanka, the treatment meted out to elephants in the wild, shows hypocrisy at its worst and the rights of elephants continue to be neglected and the government only looks after the interest to human beings from the womb to the grave for the sake of votes.
            The elephant is a priceless treasure and the greatest national economic resource of the dry zone of Sri Lanka. They possess an unequalled and unlimited potential to earn foreign exchange for the country as proved by the record incomes from the national parks at Minneriya, Giritale  and Kandulla and this in money that the elephants have earned for the country in spite of the ill treatment they are subjected to in these areas. Foreign tourists spend thousands of dollars, pounds, euros, yen etc.. to visit and watch, to photograph and study, and relax in the wild environments where elephants  gather. Sri Lanka in one of the best destinations in the world to see elephants in their numbers in natural surroundings. In short, the elephant in the magnet to attract the multitude of tourists from all over the world, which creates a great chance to build up inland tourism and the economy of the dry zone of Sri Lanka, similar to what skiing in the snowy Alps has down to Austria.
            When elephant habitats are parceled out as small individual allotments which end up as private property, they will never generate the income that elephants generate from these lands. In fact, the income earned by the elephants in capable of sustaining all these people, most of whom are forever surviving below the poverty line, living in theirs parceled out pieces of land. Even from the aspect of expenditure, elephant habitats cost the least to the government but when these elephant habitats are converted to human settlements and  cultivations, the expenditure incurred by the government runs in to millions of dollars, pounds etc.. which governments  have obtained and still obtain as loans to be paid back, with interest from foreign lending agencies.
Yasanthe De Silva
B.Sc. (Agriculture)